Sex Offender Registry

In 2006 the Adam Walsh Act was enacted into law. It made fundamental changes to the sex offender registry both federally and in state jurisdictions. It classifies sex offenders into three tiers based on their offense instead of the old system where they were classified based on risk of reoffense. There is also additional information that must be provided by sex offenders such as place of employment and email addresses.
First of all how will law enforcement monitor every single sex offender’s email address? Seems to me that for one this violates right to privacy laws as well as many terms of service of email companies. In most of the terms of service there are clauses that state a person’s information will not be disclosed unless law enforcement issues a subpoena or warrant. So are law enforcement agencies going to issue subpoenas for every single sex offenders email in the country? According to the National Center For Missing and Exploited Children there were 728,435 registered sex offenders in the United States and its territories as of 2010. Monitoring all those emails is really an impossible task.
In Michigan alone there were 46,635 sex offenders. Obviously these numbers have since gone up with all the new convictions and lack of offenders leaving the list. This has become a modern day witch hunt. Though some offenders certainly do deserve to be monitored and restricted there are others who have no business being on the registry. A person can be put on the registry for anything these days. From peeing in public to having consensual sex with someone two or three years younger than you. Thankfully in Michigan the “Romeo and Juliet” cases are being removed from the registry.
Another issue with the registry is making it public. Most people say that this is a good thing because people can monitor these offenders and help law enforcement. The problem is that people make false reports all the time and treat sex offenders like lepers. Our neighbor to the north, Canada, doesn’t even have a public registry. Only law enforcement knows who is a sex offender just like any other crime. Law enforcement is finding that this is the best and most successful approach to the sex offender problem. Michigan has even invited consultants from Canada to talk about Canada’s sex offender registry and its possible implementation in the U.S.
The whole sex offender issue has really just become a way for politicians to make it look like they are actually doing something. Most of the provisions of the registry and unenforceable due to the high number of offenders on the registry as well as some of the ridiculous guidelines. One ridiculous guideline is prohibiting non-child sex offenders from living or loitering within 1,000 feet of a school zone. This would be crimes like adult on adult rape, attempted rape, peeing in public, and other such crimes. How does it make sense to prohibit a non-child sex offender from being around a school? If the person had a child they couldn’t go to any of their sporting events or other school functions and yet are not threat to children.
Politicians need to stop inciting public fear just so they can keep their jobs. All they are doing is stirring up the public and then passing legislation that really can’t do anything but bind up the system more than it already is. Law enforcement officials are already overburdened without the resources to effectively monitor those that actually need it. The AWA legislation makes it much more difficult to monitor those that are actually dangerous. The system is going to be even more overburdened.
The system obviously needs reform. The public registry should be completely done away with and offenders should be put on the list on a case by case basis rather than just for their offense. Also no one under 18 should be put on the list. Texas currently has offenders on their list as young as 10. This is ridiculous. Also I think the registration times should be greatly reduced. I think that only the most serious and dangerous offenders should have to register for life. Others should only have to register for possibly 5 years up to 25 years in 5 year increments depending on crime as well as risk.
According to the Department of Justice the average rate of recidivism among all sex offenders since 1983 has been 9%. For all other felonies the average rate of recidivism has been 42%. So why the¬†discrepancy in monitoring and restrictions? To be honest its all about the money. If it wasn’t then why is federal money tied to states passing the AWA legislation? A few select people raise hell about sex offenders and because their voices are loud politicians listen and use the issue as a political tool. Politicians always want to look as if they are doing something when in reality all they do is a lot of talk and nonsense legislation like this.
Eventually the system will break and it will have to be fixed when its in a crisis situation. It is getting too overloaded and eventually will no longer be sustainable. It will cost too much money and require too much manpower. Plus the public will start to realize how ridiculous the system is once someone they know is on the registry. With the growing number of people on the registry from stupid legislation like this it is only a matter of time when the system will implode upon itself. Soon enough common sense will take over instead of irrational fear fueled by politicians trying to get reelected.

About Mitch

I am just a lonely vagabond wandering through life taking what comes my way.
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Sex Offender Registry

  1. Dutch Bell says:

    I am not familiar with the 3 tiers of the Adam Walsh Act.

    I can visualize: Sexual abuse of a child
    Sexual abuse of an adult
    Rape
    Attempted rape

    Each of which, in my opinion, should be listed in a separate tier or group and not necessarily related. I am assuming that each state jurisdiction will probably vary from state to state which is not necessarily a good thing.

    Should sex offenders be monitored: I think that depends on the offense. I disagree with you on child molestion. I think a child molester needs to be on a public registar for a life time. When a family moves in to a new neighborhood they need to know if a convicted child molestor is in the area. Other sex offenses need to be monitored on a case by case basis for a determined length of time. Then, after punishment and reabilitation removed from the registar.

    Rape or attempted rape of an adult does not even fit into the same category as child molestation or child rape. As you stated, I see no corellation on an attempted rape of an adult or rapeist attending grade school functions. However, it has some merit on highschool functions.

    Trying to monitor all e-mails is rediculous and out of the question.

    Dutch

    • Mitch says:

      In Michigan now a rapist or someone who attempts rape has to register for life. The reasoning is that any crime involving force should be on the register for life because they are “dangerous”. I find it interesting that 95% of sex offenders are on the list for a first offense and around 95% of sex offenders will never commit a new crime. Study after study has shown that sex offenders hardly ever re-offend. It’s only hyped up by a select few people and politicians trying to win elections and make the government money. Unfortunately those who do re-offend are usually some of the worst and get the most press. Of course the media keeps the adage going that a sex offender will re-offend and it’s just a matter of time. This is so far from the truth. Sex offenders have one of the lowest recidivism rates of all felonies. My question is why should they be put on a public registry and not other criminals such as drug dealers and thieves? There is no sanity in the registry these days.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s